Advanced Neurovascular Treatment

A minimally invasive treatment for chronic subdural hematoma

Middle meningeal artery embolization targets blood vessels that can contribute to continued bleeding and recurrence—offering eligible patients a less invasive treatment option.

01

Minimally invasive

Treatment is performed through a catheter placed in an artery, without opening the skull.

02

Targets a source of recurrence

Embolization reduces blood flow through vessels that may continue feeding the hematoma membranes.

03

Planned around each patient

It may be considered as a standalone treatment or used alongside surgical drainage, depending on the individual case.

Understanding the problem

Why can a chronic subdural hematoma come back?

A chronic subdural hematoma is a collection of blood and fluid between the brain and its outer covering. Over time, membranes can form around the collection and develop fragile blood vessels that may continue to leak.

Draining the hematoma can relieve pressure.

But drainage alone may not address the blood supply feeding those fragile membranes. That can allow the collection to persist or return.

01

A collection develops

Blood and fluid accumulate between the brain and its protective outer covering.

02

Fragile membranes form

New membranes and delicate blood vessels may develop around the hematoma.

03

Small vessels may keep leaking

Continued blood flow to the membranes can contribute to persistent or renewed bleeding.

04

The hematoma may return

The collection can enlarge again, potentially bringing symptoms back and requiring additional treatment.

The treatment

How MMA embolization interrupts the cycle

Instead of directly removing the hematoma, MMA embolization is designed to reduce blood flow to the membranes surrounding it, allowing the collection to gradually resolve.

Diagram showing the middle meningeal artery and the blood vessels supplying the membranes around a chronic subdural hematoma
The middle meningeal artery supplies the membranes associated with a chronic subdural hematoma.
01

A catheter is guided to the artery

Through a small access point, a neurointerventional specialist guides a thin catheter through the blood vessels to the middle meningeal artery.

02

Selected branches are embolized

Embolic material is delivered through the catheter to reduce blood flow to vessels supplying the membranes around the hematoma.

03

The collection can gradually resolve

With less blood reaching the membranes, continued leakage may be reduced while the body reabsorbs the hematoma over time.

MMA embolization does not directly remove the hematoma.

It addresses part of the process that can allow a chronic subdural hematoma to persist or recur. Depending on the case, it may be used alone or alongside surgical drainage.

Cerebral angiogram showing selective catheterization of the middle meningeal artery before embolization

Inside the procedure

A precise view of the artery before treatment

This cerebral angiogram shows selective catheterization of the middle meningeal artery before embolization. Angiography allows the specialist to identify the relevant vascular anatomy and carefully plan treatment.

The evidence

Landmark trials show fewer treatment failures

Large randomized clinical trials have evaluated whether adding middle meningeal artery embolization to standard care can reduce recurrence, progression and the need for another operation.

EMBOLISE Trial · 2024

4.1% Embolization plus surgery
vs.
11.3% Surgery alone

Lower risk of repeat surgery

Among 400 patients who required surgical evacuation, recurrence or progression leading to another operation occurred less often when MMA embolization was added to surgery.

Read the EMBOLISE study

STEM Trial · 2025

16% Embolization plus standard care
vs.
36% Standard care alone

Lower risk of treatment failure

In this international randomized trial, treatment failure occurred less often when MMA embolization was added to surgical or nonsurgical standard treatment.

Read the STEM study

ABS and the STEM trial

Bringing landmark clinical research to New Jersey

Ronald P. Benitez, MD, of Atlantic Brain and Spine treated the first patient enrolled in New Jersey in the STEM clinical trial—helping bring this evolving treatment approach to patients in the state.

What this may mean for patients

For appropriately selected patients, MMA embolization may reduce the likelihood that a chronic subdural hematoma will recur, progress or require another procedure. The best approach still depends on the hematoma, symptoms and the patient’s overall health.

These results reflect specific clinical-trial populations and treatment protocols. Individual outcomes vary, and not every patient is a candidate for MMA embolization.

A closer look

Treating the hematoma—and reducing the chance of return

This patient’s treatment combined drainage of the existing hematoma with MMA embolization to reduce blood flow to the surrounding membranes.

The problem A large chronic subdural hematoma causing pressure on the brain
The treatment SEPS drainage followed by MMA embolization
The follow-up Continued resolution on three-month imaging
Before treatment Initial CT scan showing a large chronic subdural hematoma
Initial CT scan The hematoma is placing pressure on the brain before treatment.
Three-month follow-up Three-month follow-up CT scan showing continued resolution of the chronic subdural hematoma
Follow-up CT scan Imaging shows the hematoma continuing to resolve with minimal remaining pressure on the brain.

Recovery continued after treatment

The drain was removed two days after the procedure. The patient was discharged to acute rehabilitation and later returned home with support. At the three-month follow-up, imaging showed continued resolution without significant recurrence.

This individual case is presented for educational purposes. Results and recovery vary according to each patient’s condition and treatment plan.

Individualized treatment

Who may benefit from MMA embolization?

MMA embolization may be considered in several clinical situations. The right treatment depends on the size of the hematoma, the pressure it is placing on the brain, symptoms, previous treatment and overall health.

Every case requires careful review.

A neurovascular specialist evaluates the patient’s imaging and medical history to determine whether embolization, drainage, observation or a combined approach is most appropriate.

A hematoma that has returned

Embolization may be considered when a chronic subdural hematoma recurs or continues to enlarge after previous treatment.

Treatment alongside drainage

For a larger or symptomatic hematoma, MMA embolization may be added to surgical drainage to address both the collection and its blood supply.

A less invasive option is preferred

Some patients may benefit from a catheter-based approach that does not require an incision in the skull, when clinically appropriate.

Additional surgery carries concern

Embolization may be evaluated for older adults or patients whose health history makes repeated operations especially concerning.

Not sure whether this treatment fits your situation?

Our specialists can review your diagnosis, imaging and prior treatment and help identify the most appropriate next step.

Get a Second Opinion

Advanced neurovascular care

Expertise across endovascular and surgical treatment

Atlantic Brain and Spine brings together neurosurgical and endovascular expertise to evaluate chronic subdural hematomas from every angle. Treatment is selected around the patient—not around one particular procedure.

Advanced catheter-based neurovascular treatment

Traditional and minimally invasive surgical options

Individualized review of imaging, symptoms and medical history

Ready when you are

Talk with a specialist about your next step

Whether you have a new diagnosis, a recurrent hematoma or questions about a recommended treatment, our team can review your situation and help you understand your options.